"Which TR" is a LARGER problem than I EXPECTED. Thoughts on my Dr. Jeff Riddle interview.

In today video, I give some thoughts on my interview with Dr. Jeff Riddle. It turns out that the "Which TR" question I asked is a much bigger problem than a cursory look entails. Here I explain why I can’t fully commit to the confession/traditional text position after giving some thoughts on my interview with Dr. Jeff Riddle. I love the TR, or the Traditional text, or the Confessional text… whatever you want to call it, but I fall short of considering it the 100% ‘Kept pure in all ages’ text.

~~~ Resources ~

Evangelical Text Criticism Blog on the Comma Joanneum: http://evangelicaltextualcriticism.blogspot.com/2021/12/on-comma-johanneum-in-printed-editions.html

Responding to the "Which TR" objection by Dr. Riddle:
http://www.jeffriddle.net/2019/11/wm-140-responding-to-which-tr-objection.html

The TBS Statement of Doctrine of Holy Scripture:
http://www.jeffriddle.net/2019/11/wm-141-resource-tbs-statement-of.html


~ Contents ~~~

0:00 Introduction
1:00 Thoughts on the interview
1:25 We agree on a lot of things
2:46 Underlying presuppositions on how textual criticism is done
4:00 Confessional / Traditional text is NOT KJVonlyism
5:12 The Which TR Question
6:52 Kept pure in all ages
7:45 Defining "Textus Receptus"
9:06 Several edition of the TR.
10:01 What is ‘pure’?
11:28 Making a concession to the TR Advocates.
12:58 Some people coming on the show!
14:06 Conclusions

#TextusReceptus #WhichTR #AlmostConvinced